Investigating the Effectiveness of Hydrocolloid Dressings Containing Silver in the Treatment of Wounds in the Donor Area of Partial Thickness Skin Seizures

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Hazrat Fatemeh Hospital (SA)

2 Professor, Department of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Hazrat Fatemeh Hospital (SA)

3 Resident of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Hazrat Fatemeh Hospital, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
Introduction & Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of hydrocolloid dressings containing silver in the treatment of wounds in the donor area of partial thickness skin seizures. Materials & Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 42 patients who needed partial thickness skin grafts for skin defect reconstruction. After removing the skin graft, the patients were randomly assigned to two groups of hydrocolloid dressing containing silver with Aquacel Ag brand (intervention group) and traditional dressing group (control group). Patients were visited on days 3, 7, 5 and 7, 14 and 21. In each visit, the frequency of dressing change, wound infection, pain during dressing change, the rate and speed of the epithelialization process, and the scar of the wound site were also compared in the two groups at the end of the sixth month. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 24 software. Results: The results showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the average number of times the need for dressing, the degree of epithelialization of the wound, in the two groups of hydrocolloid dressing with silver and traditional dressing (P-value < 0.05); However, there was no statistically significant difference between the mean prevalence of infection, pain during dressing change, vascularity, pigmentation and scar thickness in the two groups of hydrocolloid dressing with silver and traditional dressing (P-value < 0.05). Conclusions: Overall, the results of this research showed that Aquacel Ag is a safe and effective method for managing the wound in the donor area of partial thickness skin grafts.

Keywords


1. Cronin H, Goldstein G. Biologic skin substitutes and their applications in dermatology. Dermatologic surgery: official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al]. 2013; 39 (1 Pt 1):
30-4.
2. Kitala D, Kawecki M, Klama-Baryła A, Łabuś W, Kraut M, Glik J, et al. Allogeneic vs. Autologous skin grafts in the therapy of patients with burn injuries: A restrospective, open-label clinical study with pair matching. Advances in clinical and experimental medicine: official organ Wroclaw Medical University. 2016; 25(5): 923-9.
3. Voineskos SH, Ayeni OA, McKnight L, Thoma A. Systematic review of skin graft donor-site dressings. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2009; 124(1):
298-306.
4. Mahmoud SM, Mohamed AA, Mahdi SE, Ahmed ME. Split-skin graft in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Journal of wound care. 2008; 17(7):
303-6.
5. Dedmond BT, Davids JR. Function of skin grafts in children following acquired amputation of the lower extremity. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 2005; 87(5): 1054-8.
6. Sharman D. Moist wound healing: A review of evidence, application and outcome. Diabetic Foot. 2003; 6(3): 112-20.
7. Innes ME, Umraw N, Fish JS, Gomez M, Cartotto RC. The use of silver coated dressings on donor site wounds: A prospective, controlled matched pair study. Burns: journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries. 2001; 27(6): 621-7.
8. 8. Junker JP, Kamel RA, Caterson EJ,
Eriksson E. Clinical impact upon wound healing and inflammation in moist, wet, and dry
environments. Advances in wound care. 2013; 2(7):
348-56.
9. Thomas S. Hydrocolloid dressings in the management of acute wounds: A review of the literature. International wound journal. 2008; 5(5):
602-13.
10.    Zhang X, Sun D, Jiang GC. Comparative efficacy of nine different dressings in healing diabetic foot ulcer: A bayesian network analysis. Journal of diabetes. 2019; 11(6): 418-26.
11.    Leaper D. Appropriate use of silver dressings in wounds: International consensus document. International wound journal. 2012; 9(5):
461-4.
12.    Castellano JJ, Shafii SM, Ko F, Donate G, Wright TE, Mannari RJ, et al. Comparative evaluation of silver-containing antimicrobial dressings and drugs. International wound journal. 2007; 4(2):
114-22.
13.    Bowler PG, Jones SA, Walker M, Parsons D. Microbicidal properties of a silver-containing hydrofiber dressing against a variety of burn wound pathogens. The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation. 2004; 25(2): 192-6.
14.    Bowler P, Jones S, Towers V, Booth R, Parsons D, Walker M. Dressing conformability and
silver-containing wound dressings. 2010.
15.    Barnea Y, Amir A, Leshem D, Zaretski A, Weiss J, Shafir R, et al. Clinical comparative study of aquacel and paraffin gauze dressing for split-skin donor site treatment. Annals of plastic surgery. 2004; 53(2):
132-6.
16.    Walker M, Metcalf D, Parsons D, Bowler P.
A real-life clinical evaluation of a
next-generation antimicrobial dressing on acute and chronic wounds. Journal of wound care. 2015; 24(1): 11-22.
17.    Cohn SM, Lopez PP, Brown M, Namias N, Jackowski J, Li P, et al. Open surgical wounds: How does aquacel compare with wet-to-dry gauze? Journal of wound care. 2004; 13(1): 10-2.
18.    Sood A, Granick MS, Tomaselli NL. Wound dressings and comparative effectiveness data. Advances in wound care. 2014; 3(8):
511-29.
19.    Robinson BJ. The use of a hydrofibre dressing in wound management. Journal of wound care. 2000; 9(1): 32-4.
20.    Serebrakian AT, Pickrell BB, Varon DE, Mohamadi A, Grinstaff MW, Rodriguez EK, et al. Meta-analysis and systematic review of skin
graft donor-site dressings with future guidelines. Plastic and reconstructive surgery Global open. 2018; 6(9): e1928.
21.    Jude EB, Apelqvist J, Spraul M, Martini J. Prospective randomized controlled study of hydrofiber dressing containing ionic silver or
calcium alginate dressings in non-ischaemic
diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetic medicine: a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2007; 24(3):
280-8.
22.    Chundamala J, Wright JG. The efficacy and risks of using povidone-iodine irrigation to prevent surgical site infection: An evidence-based review. Canadian journal of surgery Journal canadien de chirurgie. 2007; 50(6): 473-81.
23.    Lohsiriwat V, Chuangsuwanich A. Comparison of the ionic silver-containing hydrofiber and paraffin gauze dressing on split-thickness skin graft donor sites. Annals of plastic surgery. 2009; 62(4):
421-2.
24.    Caruso DM, Foster KN, Hermans MH, Rick C. Aquacel ag in the management of partial-thickness burns: Results of a clinical trial. The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation. 2004; 25(1): 89-97.
25.    Bailey S, Carmean M, Cinat M, Burton K, Lane C, Malinoski D. A randomized comparison study of aquacel ag and glucan ii as donor site dressings with regard to healing time, cosmesis, infection rate, and patient's perceived pain: A pilot study. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 2011; 32(6): 627-32.
26.    Lee E-J, KIM J-O, HWANG T-S, Shin M-h, JEON C-w. Management of split thickness skin graft donor sites: Comparison of different dressing materials. Journal of Korean Burn Society. 2011:
107-10.
27.    Lohana P, Potokar T. Aquacel ag® in paediatric burns-a prospective audit. Annals of burns and fire disasters. 2006; 19(3): 144.